Journalists validate satirist’s research

mock-serious man smoking pipe

Horace Tweed-Bottomley

The shocking truth revealed: Man Booker prize judges favour middle-aged white male Oxford and Cambridge graduates

Today I spoke to our literary expert, Horace Tweed-Bottomley, about The Guardian’s charts on what it takes to win the Man Booker Prize. The Guardian’s statistics confirm the research in Horace’s own article from 27 August 2011, How to win the Booker prize (or at least get shortlisted).

“Well of course it’s rather jolly to have one’s own research validated, even if it has taken them over a year. I would have been even more impressed with their efforts had they included more charts on the winning formula for the content of the books, but that does involve reading them, you know. Peter Stothard informs me that only the judges do that, not journalists and certainly not book bloggers.

As an Oxbridge man I like nostalgic novels written by Oxbridge men for the Oxbridge men on the judging panel. Who doesn’t?”

© JD Ellevsen


If you liked this post, you might also like How to win the Booker prize (or at least get shortlisted) and Booker judges showing “poor form”.

One comment

Leave a reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s